| To: | "Xu, JiajunX" <jiajunx.xu@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Testing Report for Xen 3.0.3 rc1 |
| From: | Steven Smith <sos22-xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:49:36 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | 2006年10月02日 05:50:04 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <914147B2EBD9E04EBB210628A43795080266A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <914147B2EBD9E04EBB210628A43795080266A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> >> 6. Using vi in VMX hangs guest > >> > >> It's an old issue which always makes our work hard. But I think it > >> should be fixed in 3.0.3 since VI is very popular command, isn't it? > >That's not good. I'm optimistic that it was fixed by csets 11622 and > >11624 of xen-unstable, but I've never been able to reproduce this > >reliably enough to test. Could you have another go, please? > I have tried cset 11624 and using vi still will make Guest hang. If > you work in text mode and use vi, it's easy to reproduce it. Okay, would you mind trying cset 11684, please? That should have fixed it. Steven.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to support new architectures , Jimi Xenidis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [HVM][SVM] Obtaining instruction address needs to mask to 32 bits , Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to support new architectures , Ewan Mellor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Invalid length provided for SMBIOS data , Andrew D. Ball |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |