Many -- in fact, most! -- of the links to "simple examples" and "implementations" on the XOXO specification do not conform to XOXO. e.g. http://diveintomark.org/public/2004/01/xo-embeddable.xo http://odeo.com/profile/RyanKing/xoxo http://homepage.mac.com/ctholland/thelab/outlines/ They do not include class="xoxo" on the root list element. The specification says: The root element of a simple well-formed XML XOXO page is either an ol or ul with class name of "xoxo". If this class name is not really a requirement of XOXO, then the specification is misleading and should be changed. If the class name *is* a requirement, then can these examples be removed and replaced with conforming examples? -- Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS [Geek of HTML/SQL/Perl/PHP/Python/Apache/Linux] [OS: Linux 2.6.17.14-mm-desktop-9mdvsmp, up 21 days, 15:35.] Bottled Water http://tobyinkster.co.uk/blog/2008/02/18/bottled-water/