[Logic] LOGic Reply and Reply ALL

Wed Apr 20 16:12:30 EDT 2005

OK Bob, I believe that I have been able to successfully delete "LOGic is 
open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic logging program."
We will see. The has been more activity on the reflector recently that 
occurred all winter.
73,
George K3GV
DX: Long may it live !
If it isn't LOGic, then it isn't LOGging
All Outgoing E-Mail Has Been Scanned By Norton AntiVirus 2005
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "R Johnson" <k1vu at tmlp.com>
To: "LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic logging 
program." <logic at mailman.qth.net>; "LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for 
discussion of LOGic logging program." <logic at mailman.qth.net>
Cc: <k3gv at netzero.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Logic] LOGic Reply and Reply ALL
> Hi George:
> First I doubt that it has anything to do any "Redesign" at "QTH.NET" !!!
> NONE of the other 56 Lists that I belong to at qth.net have ANY problems.
>> Next, you might search your setup for the line (with quotes included):
>> "LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic logging 
> program."
>> Then either just delete it or just replace it with the word LOGic (with no 
> quotes).
>> This will at least get rid of the 3 line in the "TO:" field.
>> FWIW: The EXACT Header, as being sent by me, for this message ended up 
> being:
>> TO: "LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic 
> logging
> program." <logic at mailman.qth.net>, "LOGic is open to all radio 
> amateurs
> for discussion of LOGic logging program." 
> <logic at mailman.qth.net>
> FROM: R Johnson <k1vu at tmlp.com>
> SUBJECT: Re: [Logic] LOGic Reply and Reply ALL
> CC: k3gv at netzero.net
> BCC:
> ATTACHED:
>> As far as "I have not changed anything to do with the reflector settings 
> in ages.",
> Someone DID make changes to the list setup between 5/7/2004 and 5/10/04 
> and again
> between 3/27/05 and 3/28/05. Others on the list have aptly described it as
> "Weirdness Creep", something is happening.
>> If you're still having problems, maybe Al Waller or his staff at QTH.NET
> could give you a hand.
>> I belive the is a "Setup Switch" to "Lockout" the originators address in a
> "Reply All" and forces ALL replies thru the list. Personally I prefer this
> mode as it preserves message continuity.
>> Good luck troubleshooting your setup for LOGic.
> Let me know if I can be of any assistance in testing.
>> 73
> Bob, K1VU
>> At 09:00 4/20/2005, George Vincent K3GV wrote:
>>Bob, I have not changed anything to do with the reflector settings in 
>>ages. I will look into the settings and see what I can do. Something may 
>>have been redesigned at qth.net.
>>>>73,
>>George K3GV
>>Moderator LOGic Reflector
>>DX: Long may it live !
>>>>If it isn't LOGic, then it isn't LOGging
>>>>All Outgoing E-Mail Has Been Scanned By Norton AntiVirus 2005
>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "R Johnson" <k1vu at tmlp.com>
>>To: <logic at mailman.qth.net>
>>Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:01 AM
>>Subject: [Logic] LOGic Reply and Reply ALL
>>>>>>>Query to All:
>>>Has something changed with ME or the LOGic Reflector ???
>>>>>>Somewhere between 5/7/2004 and 5/10/04 the list address changed from:
>>>>>>logic at mailman.qth.net
>>>to
>>>"LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic logging 
>>>program." <logic at mailman.qth.net>
>>>>>>3/27/05 (Reply All) header
>>>TO:
>>>"LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic logging 
>>>program." <logic at mailman.qth.net>, "LOGic is open to all radio amateurs 
>>>for discussion of LOGic logging program." <logic at mailman.qth.net>
>>>>>>3/28/05 (Reply All) header
>>>TO:
>>>mel.martin at axare.mail.net, "LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for 
>>>discussion of LOGic logging program." <logic at mailman.qth.net>, "'LOGic 
>>>is open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic logging program.'" 
>>><logic at mailman.qth.net>
>>>>>>Sorry Mel, but you were the first message after the format change.
>>>>>>First:
>>>I could do without the "'LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for 
>>>discussion of LOGic logging program.'" Advertisement. If you subscribe 
>>>to the LOGic Reflector, you know
>>>what it is all about. The address "logic at mailman.qth.net" was fine by me.
>>>>>>Second:
>>>I don't know why a "Reply All" gets copy to the "message originator" and 
>>>TWO copies
>>>to the LOGic Reflector.
>>>>>>It seems to me that for clarity and reduced bandwidth that a simple
>>>"Reply" would be:
>>>To: logic at mailman.qth.net
>>>and a
>>>"Reply All" would be:
>>>To: mel.martin at axare.mail.net, logic at mailman.qth.net
>>>>>>The KISS principle could well applied here !!!
>>>>>>Maybe I'm missing something here. Am I ???
>>>>>>73
>>>Bob, K1VU
>>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>LOGic mailing list
>>>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>LOGic mailing list
>>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> LOGic at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>