[Logic] Identifying LoTW Contacts in LOGic ???

2003年9月12日 13:57:56 -0400

YES, it will ba combination of paper and electronic.
73
Bob, K1VU
At 21:43 9/11/2003 , you wrote:
>A newbie question about LoTW: Once ARRL activates LoTW, will they still accept
>old-fashioned paper QSLs, or a combination of paper QSLs and LoTW matches, for
>their awards? Or will LoTW be mandatory? Maybe (based on the below) we don't
>know this yet?
>>Bill / W5WVO
>>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Arthur Tan" <[email protected]>
>To: "LOGic reflector" <[email protected]>
>Sent: 11 September, 2003 5:51 PM
>Subject: Re: Re: [Logic] Identifying LoTW Contacts in LOGic ???
>>> > Hi,
> >
> > The ways I'm thinking about tracking LoTW contacts is to either (or
> > both) put a unique identifier e.g. LOTW: in the comment field or
> > create a True/False (type:logical) userfield called "LOTW" on the
> > logform, and then modifying the AWARDS report to update these fields.
> > But as Jim says, we still have to wait until the league unveils how
> > DXCC (WAS too?) award tracking will be accomplished. I've heard that
> > the ARRL is shooting for next Monday, September 15th as an official
> > release date. We'll see what happens...
> >
> > 73, Art AB4RL
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From Jim Brannigan <[email protected]> on Sep 05, 2003:
> >
> > > I agree.
> >
> > > But until the ARRL releases their proposals on award tracking we
> > > will be in limbo.
> > > Will awards be automatically conferred or incremented?
> > > How do we indicate submissions that are part paper and part LoTW?
> > > Will the ARRL maintain an "AWARDS progress" file that is viewable?
> >
> > > More questions, few answers.
> >
> > > Jim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I see no need of having separate S,R,& F designations for LoTW &
> > > eQSL. I'm willing to accept the fact that having submitted the SAME
> > > ADIF file of my entire log to BOTH LoTW and eQSL that a "Submitted
> > > Flag" is unnecessary. The same goes for a "Received Flag". So we're
> > > left with just a "Fulfilled Flag" to indicate a match on that
> > > QSO. This should make programming a little easier.
> >
> > > My next thought (or nightmare) is having to enter each match
> > > manually. I can see a real need for LoTW to export a list of
> > > "Matching Contacts" and LOGic being able to read it and update the
> > > log status.
> >
> > > I seem to have more questions than answers.
> >
> > > Your thoughts Guys and Gals.
> >
> > > 73
> > > Bob, K1VU
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LOGic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> >
>>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic