[Logic] LoTW confirmations
Arthur Tan
[email protected]
2003年10月15日 15:45:26 -0400
Hi,
I think the real issue is when is LoTW going to offer a way to export
*their* confirmation data in a format importable into LOGic.
Otherwise, no matter what system we use, it's going to be by hand
(virtually). As it is now, you have to go through your log one by one
and somehow mark LoTW confirmations. Anyone have any info on that?
73, Art
>From Dave <[email protected]> on Wed, Oct 15, 2003:
> Chris,
>> Just a thought. Do you think another check box located near the 2 for QSL's
> that are there already solve the problem? It would still involve checking it
> and entering the notation in the comment field but should work.
>> Jacques
> Email [email protected]
>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of C.M. Christensen
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:03 PM
> To: Logic
> Subject: [Logic] LoTW confirmations
>> Howdy all,
>> I am sure that each of you, including Dennis, has given this a great
> deal of thought over the past few days or weeks.
>> We are going to need some method of importing our LoTW confirmations
> into Logic so it shows DXCCSUB: in the comment field to indicate that
> the qso has been confirmed. Obviously, other awards such as WAS, etc.,
> etc., will also need to be addressed.
>> I am especially concerned that we are still capable of keeping a true
> record of the QSL cards that we send and receive. This must be separate
> from the LoTW confirmations. While it will be possible to have both a
> QSL card confirmation and an LoTW confirmation, it is also possible to
> have either one without the other. What I don't want to see is a system
> that marks an F in either the QSLS or QSLR boxes (or both) unless we
> actually have a card.
>> Knowing the ability Dennis has to get things right I am sure he is way
> ahead of me on this but I just wanted to stick my oar in the water
> before it was too late, hi.
>> --
> 73,
> Chris, AC?M