[Logic] Re: ARRL LOTW

2003年5月20日 11:09:59 -0500

Yep -- same here. PSK31 works fine but not PSK and as NA5Q mentioned in 
his post I also had trouble with the time. I had a time in the log as 
2408 -- don't quite know how I did that and did not know Logic would 
accept that but it did. Also, I had one call logged with an inadvertent 
comma behind the call. Logic took that but LoTW rejected it. I guess 
LoTW will help us clean up some pilot error in our logs!
I still am not sure how to change all of the USB and LSB in the rest of 
my log to SSB with a mass update so if anyone has some tips on that I 
would appreciate it.
-- 
73,
Chris, AC�M
Greg Hodsdon wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up on the mobile designators. I now see the
> "-m" format was rejected on the upload. Luckily my log was in 'SSB'
> format so didn't have any problems there. However, LoTW will
> not accept PSK. The correct format is PSK31.
>> 73 de Greg, K7KJ
>> Portland, OR
> [email protected]
> http://www.qsl.net/k7kj
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "C.M. Christensen" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 6:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [Logic] Re: ARRL LOTW
>>>>>Howdy all,
>>>>A couple of other things to watch out for when you convert your Logic
>>log to .ADI and then into LoTW. If you have mobile stations in your log
>>such as AC0M-M it will reject them. AC0M/M works fine but may cause some
>>fits in Logic regarding proper placement of the contact according to the
>>/M designator. Also, watch for CWN and PTOR in the mode column. LoTW
>>wants CW and TOR according to their mode list.
>>>>I did not experience any difficulty with the select criteria in the
>>Logic header but the USB and LSB thing gave me fits. Wish I could
>>remember how to mass update the log and I would change all of the USB
>>and LSB in my entire log to SSB. Back to the help pages I guess, hi.
>>>>My question is how are we going to handle confirmations for DXCC etc.,
>>in Logic once LoTW goes live. We are all comfortable with the F, R,
>>etc., in the QSLS and QSLR boxes on the log page and with checking in
>>QSL cards. We will have to keep this information current to maintain our
>>proper totals in Logic but we really won't have a QSL card. Perhaps an
>>additional box on the log page to indicate TQSL confirmation would work
>>but it will have to add into the band, county, mode, etc. totals in Logic.
>>-- 
>>73,
>>Chris, AC�M
>>>>PDA wrote:
>>>>>Dear Carl:
>>>>>>With two minor problems, LOGic appears to
>>>work fine with LOTW.
>>>>>>The two known problems are
>>>>>>1). LOGIc sends USB and LSB instead of
>>>SSB. I will fix this, but meanwhile fix it with
>>>Notepad.
>>>>>>2). The select criterial that LOGic puts in
>>>the header makes LOTW croak. This is
>>>their fault. Meanwhile, just delete it with
>>>notepad.
>>>>>>Let me know if any questions.
>>>>>>Tnx & 73,
>>>>>>Dennis WN4AZY
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dear Dennis,
>>>>>>>>How are you coming with the subject addition to LOGic?
>>>>>>>>I see that they are now beta testing.
>>>>>>>>73, Carl VE9OV
>>>>>>>>>>>>================================
>>>WHEN REPLYING, PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF
>>>THIS MESSAGE IN YOUR REPLY. THANK YOU.
>>>>>>Personal Database Applications
>>>1323 Center Dr.
>>>Auburn, GA 30011-3318 USA
>>>>>>770-307-1511
>>>770-307-0760 Fax
>>>>>>Check out our web page! Tell others about it! Thanks.
>>>>>> http://www.hosenose.com/
>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>LOGic mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>LOGic mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>