[Kenwood] BPL - Email the White House

Sun Jun 27 13:13:17 EDT 2004

Amen!
Amateur radio operators have had their fingers in every electronic
intervention! To lead a simple thing like BPL discourage us is a shame. I
have said all along that that ad BPL filter can be developed and deployed.
Some donations may be required, however, that should not stop us either.
Please remember, whatever the mind of man can conceive; the mind of man can
achieve! The mind of man is many men working towards the same goal. We
have some of the most brilliant people and the world that are amateur
operators. If you wish to give up, I said jest that you start selling your
equipment now. I for one, believe, then BPL can be beaten. We have put
satellites inand gone to the moon. Do we accept the challenge?
73 de n8csp kn
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carey Fisher - NCS" <careyfisher at ncsradio.com>
To: "Daniel Seagraves" <dseagrav at sakura.lunar-tokyo.net>
Cc: "Kenwood List Server" <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 12:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Kenwood] BPL - Email the White House
> Lost Causes are the only ones worth fighting for.
>> Carey Fisher, K8VZ
> Chief Technical Officer
> New Communications Solutions, LLC
> website: www.ncsradio.com
>> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kenwood-admin at mailman.qth.net
> > [mailto:kenwood-admin at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Daniel Seagraves
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 1:04 PM
> > Cc: Kenwood List Server
> > Subject: Re: [Kenwood] BPL - Email the White House
> >
> >
> > On 2004年4月28日, S. Markowski Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > "OVER? Did he say OVER? Nothing's over until we decide it
> > is.........
> >
> > Well, if the FCC already authorized it, the legislative fight is
over.
> >
> > I am not saying we should just give up on HF - Quite the
> > contrary. We just
> > need to start working on ways to use the affected spectrum despite
the
> > interference. The interference will be man-made, which means
> > it cannot be
> > truly random, and if it can be identified as a pattern it can
> > be filtered
> > out. We're supposed to have as reputation for being innovators and
> > technicians - Now we have to depend on this to continue as we do.
> > Originally everyone said shortwave was useless. Hams proved
> > this wrong and
> > paved the way for modern communications. Now everyoen says shortwave
is
> > useless because the interference from BPL will wipe it out.
> > BPL is coming
> > and there's nothing we can realistically do about it. The dollars
just
> > don't add up. The only way to feasably continue is to look for ways
to
> > overcome the interference and make the "impossible" possible
> > again. Even
> > if we stop it in the USA, I'm sure some other country is going
> > to pick it
> > up, and given the global propagation of HF signals it only takes one
to
> > wipe out a band for an entire hemisphere.
> >
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ kenwood-owner at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> >
> >
>> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>>