[Kenwood] re unsubscribe please

2003年1月15日 15:41:23 +1100

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:10 PM
Subject: Kenwood digest, Vol 4 #15 - 17 msgs
> Send Kenwood mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Kenwood digest..."
>>> Today's Topics:
>> 1. WTB: Kenwood Sp-520 (John Sanders)
> 2. Re: SM-220 question??? (n4lq)
> 3. WTB: AT-850 (Robin Midgett)
> 4. Re: WTB: Kenwood Sp-520 (Durwydd MacTara)
> 5. need help (McKay)
> 6. TR50 reviews/impressions (John Geiger)
> 7. Need part for TS180 ([email protected])
> 8. Re: [Icom] WTB 1296 rig (David Houlden)
> 9. Thanks for response (McKay)
> 10. Re: TS-830S Problems 2 diff. 830S' (Les Severson)
> 11. Re: SM-220 question??? (Don Buska)
> 12. WTB 1296 rig (John Geiger)
> 13. CW filter question ([email protected])
> 14. Re: CW filter question (Mike Brown)
> 15. Re: CW filter question (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
> 16. Re: SM-220 question??? (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
> 17. FS: KNWD TS-450S/AT, PLUS ACCESSORIES (Joseph W. Lutz)
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 1
> Date: 2003年1月14日 04:34:04 -0800 (PST)
> From: John Sanders <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Kenwood] WTB: Kenwood Sp-520
>> I am looking for a good clean external speaker to
> match my ts-520s. Thank you... John
>> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 2
> Date: 2003年1月14日 07:38:53 -0500
> From: "n4lq" <[email protected]>
> To: "Gary McAdams" <[email protected]>,
> "kenwood" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] SM-220 question???
>> I did a bit more study of the TS-930 schematic. The IF output is from the
> last IF, 100khz. Why? Who knows?
> The BP-5 would do nothing either. I believe it's made for 3.x mhz.
> For some reason, Kenwood skipped the 930 for use with a band scope. I
> checked the schematic for the 940. It has an isolation amplifier tapped
> off the 8mhz first IF and feeds to IF output #2.
> The 930's manual had me fooled. It actually shows a picture of the SM-220
> plugged into the IF out jack!!!
> I believe what I'll try is tapping off the 8mhz IF with a 20pf capacitor
> and feeding the scope. Hopefully it won't load down the IF amp. If this
> works, I'll just connect that useless IF port up to the mod and use it
> that way.
>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Gary McAdams" <[email protected]>
> To: "Steve Ellington" <[email protected]>, "kenwood"
> <[email protected]>
> Date: 2003年1月13日 21:21:17 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] SM-220 question???
>> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Steve Ellington <[email protected]>
> >
> > > I had to buy an SM-220 to find out that it won't work as a band scope
> > for
> > > the TS-930. The 930 has a 455khz IF output and the SM-220 with the
> > BP8 has
> > > an 8.8mhz input.
> > > Does anyone know why Kenwood would have provided an IF output that
> > doesn't
> > > work with their own scope? I'm perplexed.
> > >
> > > Steve
> > > N4LQ
> > >
> > Steve:
> >
> > According to my SM-220 Manual, the TS-900 series needed the
> > BS-5 which was to be connected from the NB unit X54-1040-10,
> > pin 31, through a 1000pf cap.
> >
> > The manual does not get any more specific than that, however.
> > On my TS-940 it is connected directly to the IF-2 jack on the back
> > panel.
> >
> > Gotta run...
> >
> > 73 and CUL Gary WG7X
> >
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> >
>>> --__--__--
>> Message: 3
> Date: 2003年1月14日 08:50:56 -0600
> To: [email protected]
> From: Robin Midgett <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Kenwood] WTB: AT-850
>> Hi Readers,
> I'm in the market for an AT-850 auto tuner for the TS-850.
>> Thanks,
> Robin Midgett KB4IDC
> VHF+ Glutton
>>> --__--__--
>> Message: 4
> From: "Durwydd MacTara" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] WTB: Kenwood Sp-520
> Date: 2003年1月14日 14:55:26 +0000
>> I have a nice clean SP-230 with filters that I will swap for a "clear
> speech" unit. Perfect match!
> Durwydd MacTara
>> >From: John Sanders <[email protected]>
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: [Kenwood] WTB: Kenwood Sp-520
> >Date: 2003年1月14日 04:34:04 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >I am looking for a good clean external speaker to
> >match my ts-520s. Thank you... John
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do you Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> >http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> >- - -
> >
> >Your moderator for this list is:
> >Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Kenwood mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>>> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>>> --__--__--
>> Message: 5
> From: "McKay" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 2003年1月14日 13:39:12 -0500
> Subject: [Kenwood] need help
>> Just bought a new TS-570D (G) about five days ago. A problem has occurred
> twice since I started using it.
> Problem---turn on power supply, turn on rig, display lights up, but radio
> doesn't play. No buttons work and no knobs work. Push or turn button or
knob
> and I get a beep. I turn rig off, then turn on and it plays. Should I be
> concerned or is it just a glitch now and then we live with? I have no
> Kenwood experience so any help would be appreciated.
> 73, Archie, K4GA
>>>> --__--__--
>> Message: 6
> Date: 2003年1月14日 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
> From: John Geiger <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: [Kenwood] TR50 reviews/impressions
>> I have always been intrigued by the Kenwood TR50
> portable 1296 FM rig. I have never seen one up close
> or read a review on one, though. Has anyone ever used
> one of these radio? What did you think of it? Even
> better, does anyone have one for sale?
>> 73s John NE0P
>>>> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 7
> From: [email protected]
> Date: 2003年1月14日 14:46:51 EST
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Kenwood] Need part for TS180
>> Does anyone have a TS180S that they are selling out parts from?
> I am looking for the DFC180 Memory Unit.
> I want to replace the one I have in my TS180S since it no longer stores
> memory and no one seems to be able to fix it.
> Time for plan B.
> Thanks,
> Dan
>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 8
> From: "David Houlden" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
> <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Date: 2003年1月14日 16:19:54 -0000
> Subject: [Kenwood] Re: [Icom] WTB 1296 rig
>> Hi John,
>> There is an ICOM IC 1271, boxed, manual, microphone
> and service manual at http://www.shortwave.co.uk
> if you decide to go for a multimode.
>> They can post on to you no problem.
>> Regards,
>> Dave.
>>>>> --__--__--
>> Message: 9
> From: "McKay" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: 2003年1月14日 16:12:20 -0500
> Subject: [Kenwood] Thanks for response
>> Thanks to the guys who responded for my request for help. The majority
> suggested I return to dealer and get a new rig. That sounds like a plan.
One
> person asked about power supply. Bought an Astron 35A, as suggested by
> dealer. I am going to call the dealer right now. Thanks again for your
help.
> 73, Archie, K4GA
>>>> --__--__--
>> Message: 10
> Date: 2003年1月14日 16:55:24 -0600
> From: Les Severson <[email protected]>
> To: Clif <[email protected]>, kenwood <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] TS-830S Problems 2 diff. 830S'
>> Hi Clif,
>> BINGO !!!!
> Several clicks of the Proc switch brought everything back to normal..
> You have my sincere gratitude !
> Best 73, Les, W�OJH
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Clif wrote:
> > Sounds like something "went away" Have you tried cycling the Proc switch
> > rapidly several times. They are prone to failure and the TX audio is
routed
> > thru it. Try that and let me know.
> >
> > Clif Holland, KA5IPF
> > AVVid
> > Authorized Kenwood and Icom Service
> > www.avvid.com
> > 1-800-214-5779
> > 972-554-6801
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Les Severson" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Clif Holland" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 9:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Kenwood] TS-830S Problems 2 diff. 830S'
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hi Clif,
> >>
> >>Tnx for writing..
> >>
> >>The ALC reading is very low with the mic gain cranked way up.
> >>My mic is an MC-60A with the internal amp shut off. I tried a different
> >>mic but results were the same. This happened all the sudden a few days
> >>ago. I am kinda assuming that something has gone awry in the audio
> >>driver section. BTW, The RF output meter I'm using is a "Dosy" peak
> >>reading meter. It may not be perfectly accurate but it gives me a good
> >>ballpark reading.
>> >>>
>>>> --__--__--
>> Message: 11
> From: "Don Buska" <[email protected]>
> To: "Gary McAdams" <[email protected]>,
> "kenwood" <[email protected]>, "n4lq" <[email protected]>
> Date: 2003年1月14日 20:00:01 -0600 (CST)
> Reply-To: "Don Buska" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] SM-220 question???
>> Actually having the low IF out isn't bad at all. On the R-820 receiver
Kenwood
> brought out the High IF and Low IF (There are actually three IF
frequencies in this
> receiver - triple conversion). I have one SM-220 with a BS-8 in it to
perform the
> frequency spectrum display function and the low frequency IF is connected
to the
> regular scope function on another SM-220 without BS-8. Thus providing a
full view of
> the RF envelope waveform of the received signal. You can if an AM station
is over
> modulating, cool! So my R-820 transceived with my TS-820 and the two
SM-220 sure
> makes one heck of a powerful station. Even the new display type rigs
don't offer all
> that viewing at one time, hi. Maybe over kill, but it sure impresses
visitors. Since
> I have a Drake C-Line, a Collins S-Line, why not a Kenwood 8-line hi hi.
>> 73
>> Don N9OO
>>>>>> On 2003年1月14日 07:38:53 -0500, n4lq wrote:
>> >I did a bit more study of the TS-930 schematic. The IF output is from the
> >last IF, 100khz. Why? Who knows?
> >The BP-5 would do nothing either. I believe it's made for 3.x mhz.
> >For some reason, Kenwood skipped the 930 for use with a band scope. I
> >checked the schematic for the 940. It has an isolation amplifier tapped
> >off the 8mhz first IF and feeds to IF output #2.
> >The 930's manual had me fooled. It actually shows a picture of the SM-220
> >plugged into the IF out jack!!!
> >I believe what I'll try is tapping off the 8mhz IF with a 20pf capacitor
> >and feeding the scope. Hopefully it won't load down the IF amp. If this
> >works, I'll just connect that useless IF port up to the mod and use it
> >that way.
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: "Gary McAdams" <[email protected]>
> >To: "Steve Ellington" <[email protected]>, "kenwood"
> ><[email protected]>
> >Date: 2003年1月13日 21:21:17 -0800
> >Subject: Re: [Kenwood] SM-220 question???
> >
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Steve Ellington <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> > I had to buy an SM-220 to find out that it won't work as a band scope
> >> for
> >> > the TS-930. The 930 has a 455khz IF output and the SM-220 with the
> >> BP8 has
> >> > an 8.8mhz input.
> >> > Does anyone know why Kenwood would have provided an IF output that
> >> doesn't
> >> > work with their own scope? I'm perplexed.
> >> >
> >> > Steve
> >> > N4LQ
> >> >
> >> Steve:
> >>
> >> According to my SM-220 Manual, the TS-900 series needed the
> >> BS-5 which was to be connected from the NB unit X54-1040-10,
> >> pin 31, through a 1000pf cap.
> >>
> >> The manual does not get any more specific than that, however.
> >> On my TS-940 it is connected directly to the IF-2 jack on the back
> >> panel.
> >>
> >> Gotta run...
> >>
> >> 73 and CUL Gary WG7X
> >>
> >> - - -
> >>
> >> Your moderator for this list is:
> >> Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Kenwood mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> >>
> >
> >- - -
> >
> >Your moderator for this list is:
> >Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Kenwood mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>>>> --__--__--
>> Message: 12
> Date: 2003年1月14日 18:04:08 -0800 (PST)
> From: John Geiger <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Kenwood] WTB 1296 rig
>> > Looking to get a 1.2g rig for VHF contesting. Will
> > have to limit myself to FM, as I know that 1296 all
> > modes are out of my price range right now. Would be
> > interested in the following rigs:
> > Icom IC120
> > Icom IC X2A
> > Icom IC X21A
> > Icom 12GAT
> > Icom T81
> > Kenwood TH59
> > Kenwood TR50
> > Yaesu FT911
> >
> > AM I forgetting any FM rigs? Let me know if you
> > have
> > one of these for sale, or anything else that would
> > work.
> >
> > 73 John NE0P
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> > now.
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> >
>>> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 13
> From: [email protected]
> Date: 2003年1月14日 21:40:26 EST
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Kenwood] CW filter question
>> Hi all
> I have a CW filter question for the 450/690. I am planning on having one
500
> wide and one 270 wide filter for contesting. The idea is to use the 500
when
> CQ'ing so that I can hear somebody if they're a bit off from me, and to
use
> the 270 for S&P where I already have the other staion tuned. Since I have
a
> choice of which IF to put which filter, does anybody have a suggestion on
> whether the 270 should go in the 8.8 or the 455 spot?
>> Also - is the 850 similar in filter arrangement to the 450?
>> Tnx
> Frank
> W2FCA
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 14
> Date: 2003年1月15日 03:24:21 +0000
> From: "Mike Brown" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] CW filter question
>> Frank, a few years ago when I was about to put cw filters in my 850 (yes,=
> it
> has the 8.83 mhz IF and the 455khz IF also) I contacted Inrad and asked
> about using 250 hz filters. Their suggestion was to use 400 hz filters in
> both IF's as they said the 250 hz would ring too much. So that is what I
> went with. Maybe some others have different opinions, but I have been hap=
> py
> with the 2 400 hz Inrad filters in the 850. =0D
> =0D
> Mike - K9MI=0D
> =0D
> =0D
> =0D
> -------Original Message-------=0D
> =0D
> From: [email protected]=0D
> Date: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:41:50 AM=0D
> To: [email protected]=0D
> Subject: [Kenwood] CW filter question=0D
> =0D
> Hi all=0D
> I have a CW filter question for the 450/690. I am planning on having one =
> 500
> =0D
> wide and one 270 wide filter for contesting. The idea is to use the 500 w=
> hen
> =0D
> CQ'ing so that I can hear somebody if they're a bit off from me, and to u=
> se =0D
> the 270 for S&P where I already have the other staion tuned. Since I have=
> a =0D
> choice of which IF to put which filter, does anybody have a suggestion on=
> =0D
> whether the 270 should go in the 8.8 or the 455 spot?=0D
> =0D
> Also - is the 850 similar in filter arrangement to the 450?=0D
> =0D
> Tnx=0D
> Frank=0D
> W2FCA=0D
> - - -=0D
> =0D
> Your moderator for this list is:=0D
> Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]=0D
> =0D
> _______________________________________________=0D
> Kenwood mailing list=0D
> [email protected]=0D
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood=0D
> =2E=20
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/related
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> image/gif
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 15
> Date: 2003年1月14日 21:45:52 -0600
> From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer" <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Organization: Gerald N. Johnson
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] CW filter question
>> 500 in the 8 MHz, maybe 270 in the 455 IF, and use them cascaded.
>> Some Kenwood, 270 I've found to ring annoyingly, passing a near tone
> just from noise. Makes copying CW a lot more work.
>> 73, Jerry, K0CQ
> --
> Entire content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer.
> Reproduction by permission only.
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 16
> Date: 2003年1月14日 21:45:48 -0600
> From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer" <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Organization: Gerald N. Johnson
> To: Don Buska <[email protected]>
> Cc: Gary McAdams <[email protected]>,
> kenwood <[email protected]>, n4lq <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] SM-220 question???
>> The trouble with putting the scope after one or more filters is that the
> filter will clean up a bad signal and make it look good. It will have
> left off the splatter and so will hide the clipping that caused that
> splatter. Looks great but isn't useful information.
>> 73, Jerry, K0CQ
> --
> Entire content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer.
> Reproduction by permission only.
>> --__--__--
>> Message: 17
> Date: 2003年1月15日 04:05:19 +0000
> From: "Joseph W. Lutz" <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Organization: Retired
> To: FORSALE-SWAP <[email protected]>,
> KENWOOD <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Kenwood] FS: KNWD TS-450S/AT, PLUS ACCESSORIES
>>> [Item 1]
> TS-450S/AT [Auto antenna tuner], power cord and Manual.
> Unit has optional YG-455C-1 CW filter installed.
> Unit in VGC and operational. Photos if needed.
> Price: 500ドル.00 + Shipping & Insurance
>> [Item 2]
> KNWD SP-23 Speaker [Mint] - Price: 70ドル.00 + Shipping
>> [Item 3]
> KNWD IF-232C PC interface with connecting cable,
> Power cable and Instruction manual.
> Price: 75ドル.00 + Shipping
>> [Item 4]
> KNWD MC-60 Mic - Works great - small 'ding' on face
> plate [can provide photo if requested].
> Price: 90ドル.00 + Shipping
>> **Will sell for Lot Price of: 650ドル.00 + Shipping/Insurance
>> [Shipping from 15905]
>> 73,
> Joe W7LPF
>>> --__--__--
>> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>>> End of Kenwood Digest
>>