[Dxbase] FW: !! NEW VERSION time coming soon ----Re: Interesting Problem

Thu Jun 1 20:05:34 EDT 2017

Just want to publicly thank Joe for his continuing dedication and work
keeping things going with DXBase. Yet another "Dayton" (Xenia) has passed
and if it wasn't for Joe, a lot of us would not be enjoying DXBase...much
less a new version. Thanks, Joe! 73, Greg-N4CC
-----Original Message-----
From: Dxbase [mailto:dxbase-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Neal
Campbell
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 12:45 PM
To: Joseph Glockner
Cc: DXBase List
Subject: Re: [Dxbase] !! NEW VERSION time coming soon ----Re: Interesting
Problem
Its not months away, just not days either.
Neal Campbell
Abroham Neal LLC
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Neal Campbell <nealk3nc at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>> I stopped coding a week ago as I was doing more damage than good so I 
> needed to take a break.
>> I will keep you all updated when its available, (but the code get rid 
> of registration callsign checks has been eliminated already...)
>>> Neal Campbell
> Abroham Neal LLC
>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Joseph Glockner <wa6axe at verizon.net>
> wrote:
>>> Neal,
>>>> You might look forward to the day it is no longer needed (Reg file)...
>>>> BUT - we the users of DXbase2007 are MORE interested in the PROMISED 
>> NEW Version of DXbase by Dayton timeframe -- and that is roughly ONE 
>> MONTH from now ...
>>>> Joseph Glockner
>> wa6axe at verizon.net
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc at gmail.com>
>> To: Fred Handscombe <fredch at homeshack.freeserve.co.uk>
>> Cc: DXBase List <dxbase at mailman.qth.net>
>> Sent: Mon, Apr 25, 2016 1:18 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Dxbase] Interesting Problem
>>>> I look forward to the day its no longer needed....
>>>>>> Neal Campbell
>> Abroham Neal LLC
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Fred Handscombe < 
>> fredch at homeshack.freeserve.co.ukfredch@homeshack.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> > Spot on Joe I'm sure
>> >
>> > That is one crazy system!
>> >
>> > 73 Fred
>> > G4BWP
>> >
>> >
>> > On 25/04/2016 18:10, Joseph Glockner wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dick,
>> >>
>> >> One question -- what was the OPRCALL assigned to those 26 QSOs?
>> >> If the OPRCALL on those QSOs is NOT in your reg file - they will 
>> >> not show-up in the totals, etc ...
>> >>
>> >> 73
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Joseph Glockner
>> >> wa6axe at verizon.netwa6axe@verizon.net