[Dxbase] Summary vs. LoTW credits - an another way...

w3sb at ptd.net w3sb at ptd.net
Mon Apr 4 17:47:11 EDT 2011


Gents,
Rather than doing a line-by-line paper comparison, I developed an
Excel-based approach to check that my DXB records match up with my ARRL
LoTW DXCC records. Excel functions are used to do cell-by-cell 
comparisons and tag any discrepancies. I've used this method ever since
LoTW came online and my DXCC records were available electronically. I've
used the method to uncover errors (on my part and by ARRL) after numerous
DXCC applications. If anyone is interested, I can work with you offline to
develop the Excel file with your specific DXCC and DXB records. Now that I
have 353 countries confirmed, there's not much on to chase so I have time
to work on these types of projects, hi. 
73, Stokley W3SB
W3SB at PTD.net 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Dxbase digest..."
>>> Today's Topics:
>> 1. Summary vs. LOTW Question (Crownhaven)
> 2. Re: Summary vs. LOTW Question (Bill Parry)
> 3. Moving DXbase to new Win7/64 computer (Arnljot Brunvoll)
> 4. Re: Moving DXbase to new Win7/64 computer (Joe WA6AXE)
> 5. Re: DXB DOS users - Joe wa6axe (Richard Powell)
> 6. Re: Summary vs. LOTW Question (Wes N7WS)
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Message: 1
> Date: 2011年4月03日 14:57:20 -0500
> From: Crownhaven <crownhaven at bellsouth.net>
> Subject: [Dxbase] Summary vs. LOTW Question
> To: DXBase Reflector <dxbase at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <4D98D120.1030101 at bellsouth.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>> Patience please.....I love the summary table on DXBase. It is the 
> greatest thing since........(you choose). However, I'm about positive 
> that there are probably a couple of discrepancies between my official 
> ARRL totals and what I have on DXB. Yes, I do download my 
> confirmations, etc. However, I have been at this for several decades 
> and there is always the possibility that early on, I got some stuff to 
> the ARRL that isn't in DXB. Maybe. I'm not 100% sure.
>> To my knowledge, the only way to check your ARRL confirmations against 
> DXB is to print out your totals and look them up manually. Do I have 
> this right? 
>> Steve, N4JQQ
>>> ------------------------------
>> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 15:47:53 -0500
> From: "Bill Parry" <bparry at rgv.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: [Dxbase] Summary vs. LOTW Question
> To: "'Crownhaven'" <crownhaven at bellsouth.net>,	"'DXBase Reflector'"
> 	<dxbase at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>> Howdy Steve,
>> I think you are right. I did this about a year ago. I printed out my
> country
> files from the "numeric totals" and painstakingly checked them against my
> cards and LOTW lists. NOT FUN. It wasn't as bad as I thought it was going
> to
> be but I found that DXBase had couple of band credits that I had no card
> for. I also found out that some of my specific band and mode totals were
> wrong because years ago they didn't give credit for anything but mixed so
> if
> I had a country, for example, confirmed on 80 CW the ARRL records only
show
> credit but not CW or 80. I guess that guys that have this straightened
out
> have sent those cards back in to get the band and mode credit. I am not
> going to the trouble or expense to fix this! My overall totals are as
good
> as they are going to be so I am just waiting for my last three to come on
> the air so I can snag them.
>> Good luck!
>> Bill W5VX 
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: dxbase-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:dxbase-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> On Behalf Of Crownhaven
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 2:57 PM
> To: DXBase Reflector
> Subject: [Dxbase] Summary vs. LOTW Question
>> Patience please.....I love the summary table on DXBase. It is the 
> greatest thing since........(you choose). However, I'm about positive 
> that there are probably a couple of discrepancies between my official 
> ARRL totals and what I have on DXB. Yes, I do download my 
> confirmations, etc. However, I have been at this for several decades 
> and there is always the possibility that early on, I got some stuff to 
> the ARRL that isn't in DXB. Maybe. I'm not 100% sure.
>> To my knowledge, the only way to check your ARRL confirmations against 
> DXB is to print out your totals and look them up manually. Do I have 
> this right? 
>> Steve, N4JQQ
> ______________________________________________________________
> Dxbase mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Dxbase at mailman.qth.net
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>> ------------------------------
>> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:33:45 +0200
> From: Arnljot Brunvoll <Arnljot at bitscom.no>
> Subject: [Dxbase] Moving DXbase to new Win7/64 computer
> To: "dxbase at mailman.qth.net" <dxbase at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID:
> 	<637FA1404846804CB8F3C628C72C5E824249F65C3A at SBS.bitscom.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> I have been running DXbase2005, -2006 and -2007 with different callsign
> databases and QSL cards on my old computer and plan to move everything to
> DXbase2007 on my new Windows 7 64-bit machine. The three versions have
> coexisted nicely on my old Windows XP computer but it crashed recently
due
> to a mainboard failure (I do have backup!) and I don't want to move all
the
> DXbase versions to my new computer, even if it is possible.
>> I know I must get a new key for DXbase2007 to allow the callsigns from
> DXbase2005 and 2006 to be used.
> I know the procedure for installing DXbase2007 on Windows 7/64, as
outlined
> by Neal, but before I do that I want to be sure I don't run into
problems.
>> I have converted all the databases to DXbase2007 format and they all seem
> to be ok.
>> I plan to merge the databases with callsigns LA3LJ and LA3LJ/P into one
> database, but need to be able to handle QSL card printing separately for
> each call because the QSL cards are different.
>> - Can this be handled by just entering the appropriate callsign
> LA3LJ or LA3LJ/P in the operator field and select the proper call when
> printing?
>> - Is this the only field I can use for selection when printing
QSL
> cards? I also use LOTW.
>>> - Are there any issues when it comes to moving the QSL card
files
> from DXbase2005 and 2006 to DXbase2007? Which file types need to be
moved,
> and do I need to edit the QSL cards from previous versions of DXbase to
> accommodate (possible) changes in the embedded code?
>> Any good advice will be appreciated.
>> Arnie LA3LJ
>>> ------------------------------
>> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:05:31 -0500
> From: Joe WA6AXE <wa6axe at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Dxbase] Moving DXbase to new Win7/64 computer
> To: <arnljot at bitscom.no>, <dxbase at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <BAY166-w5754C569F2604EC666BDCB93A30 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>> Arnie,
>> In DXbase2007 - when you go to PRINT the QSL cards - in the small pop-up
> window 
> that is entitled: "Select Label Type" -- there is a textbox that is
named
> as: Operator Callsign
> -- you only need to type in the "one" Operator Callsign (LA3LJ versus
> LA3LJ/P) that you are
> going to PRINT at that time ...
>> Any of the QSL Card files/Label Files that you had in 2005/2006 can be
> copied and pasted
> into your DXbase2007 Labels directory -- there is nothing that needs to
be
> done - as the version
> of the COMBIT s/w that 2005, 2006, and 2007 is using is the SAME. When
you
> MOVE from
> 2005 or 2006 QSL Card or Label files -- just be sure to move ALL three of
> the same named
> files (with the CRD, CRV, CRP -- and LBL, LBV, and LBP file extensions)
> together..
>> 73 Joe wa6axe
>>>> From: Arnljot at bitscom.no
>> To: dxbase at mailman.qth.net
>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:33:45 +0200
>> Subject: [Dxbase] Moving DXbase to new Win7/64 computer
>>>> I have been running DXbase2005, -2006 and -2007 with different callsign
>> databases and QSL cards on my old computer and plan to move everything
to
>> DXbase2007 on my new Windows 7 64-bit machine. The three versions have
>> coexisted nicely on my old Windows XP computer but it crashed recently
>> due to a mainboard failure (I do have backup!) and I don't want to move
>> all the DXbase versions to my new computer, even if it is possible.
>>>> I know I must get a new key for DXbase2007 to allow the callsigns from
>> DXbase2005 and 2006 to be used.
>> I know the procedure for installing DXbase2007 on Windows 7/64, as
>> outlined by Neal, but before I do that I want to be sure I don't run
into
>> problems.
>>>> I have converted all the databases to DXbase2007 format and they all
seem
>> to be ok.
>>>> I plan to merge the databases with callsigns LA3LJ and LA3LJ/P into one
>> database, but need to be able to handle QSL card printing separately for
>> each call because the QSL cards are different.
>>>> - Can this be handled by just entering the appropriate callsign
>> LA3LJ or LA3LJ/P in the operator field and select the proper call when
>> printing?
>>>> - Is this the only field I can use for selection when printing
>> QSL cards? I also use LOTW.
>>>>>> - Are there any issues when it comes to moving the QSL card
>> files from DXbase2005 and 2006 to DXbase2007? Which file types need to
be
>> moved, and do I need to edit the QSL cards from previous versions of
>> DXbase to accommodate (possible) changes in the embedded code?
>>>> Any good advice will be appreciated.
>>>> Arnie LA3LJ
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Dxbase mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Dxbase at mailman.qth.net
>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> ------------------------------
>> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 09:05:18 -0400
> From: "Richard Powell" <Richardpowell at comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: [Dxbase] DXB DOS users - Joe wa6axe
> To: <dxbase at mailman.qth.net>
> Message-ID: <000001cbf2c8$f31212a0$d93637e0$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>> Hi Joe,
>>>> I purchased the DXbase 2007 upgrade in August 2010, and with the help of
> Neal, I was able to (1) move my old dos files from backed up floppies,
> (original computer died long ago) into DXB2005, and then (2) to get them
> into DXB 2007. All worked fine to that point.
>>>> Just getting back on the air after retirement this past year. I have now
> had
> the time to check each card against the new database and have also been
> successful using the export and import to/from LoTW via the AD1F format.
>>>> I have found one issue I am hoping you might have a suggestion on how to
> tackle.
>>>> Current Issue:
>> In the dos version (I believe) there was no field for the operator call.
>>From 1983 until 10/1/1990, I had the advanced call of KB1KX. From
>>10/2/1990,
> I upgraded to the extra call, WK1J. After bringing all the records into
> DXB2007 from DOS/DXB2005, all the records have the operator call of WK1J.

>>>> I would like to be able to change the operator call for those records
> (1983-1990) back to KB1KX. Currently that operation is prohibited by
trying
> to change the operator call and update the record. Is there an easy way
to
> get the operator call on those records changed?
>>>> I greatly appreciate any suggestions you might have. I have enjoyed the
new
> 2007 program and being back on the air. 
>>>> Thank you in advance and best 73,
>> Dick Powell, WK1J
>>>> ------------------------------
>> Message: 6
> Date: 2011年4月04日 08:05:45 -0700
> From: Wes N7WS <n7ws at k6mhe.com>
> Subject: Re: [Dxbase] Summary vs. LOTW Question
> To: dxbase at mailman.qth.net
> Message-ID: <4D99DE49.2040903 at k6mhe.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>> I'm pretty much in the same boat and did the same thing. Over the years
> I've 
> resubmitted a few that I only had Mixed credit for, but after a couple of

> divorces, and ex-wives throwing away stuff, some of the cards are long
> gone, 
> but mostly nothing that I haven't worked many times since. You are a
> little 
> better off than I am. I need four more :-(
>> Wes Stewart, N7WS
>> On 4/3/2011 1:47 PM, Bill Parry wrote:
>> Howdy Steve,
>>>> I think you are right. I did this about a year ago. I printed out my
>> country
>> files from the "numeric totals" and painstakingly checked them against
my
>> cards and LOTW lists. NOT FUN. It wasn't as bad as I thought it was
going
>> to
>> be but I found that DXBase had couple of band credits that I had no card
>> for. I also found out that some of my specific band and mode totals
were
>> wrong because years ago they didn't give credit for anything but mixed
so
>> if
>> I had a country, for example, confirmed on 80 CW the ARRL records only
>> show
>> credit but not CW or 80. I guess that guys that have this straightened
>> out
>> have sent those cards back in to get the band and mode credit. I am not
>> going to the trouble or expense to fix this! My overall totals are as
>> good
>> as they are going to be so I am just waiting for my last three to come
on
>> the air so I can snag them.
>>>> Good luck!
>>>> Bill W5VX
>>>> ------------------------------
>> ______________________________________________________________
> Dxbase mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Dxbase at mailman.qth.net
>>> End of Dxbase Digest, Vol 84, Issue 5
> *************************************


More information about the Dxbase mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /