[Dxbase] Updater - Question/Issue
Al Burnham (K6RIM)
k6rim at pacbell.net
Tue Nov 9 15:34:26 EST 2010
Carsten:
Yes, that PJ5/K1XM QSO and the LOTW entry would be valid for the/*OLD*/ PJ5.
The problem, at least as I see it, is that the Updater shows that contact confirms the/*NEW*/ PJ5.
I think Neal understands; take a look at his reply to my post.
73,
Al, K6RIM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PJ5/K1XM on 10/10/10 at /*0253Z*/ QSO should still count "for the old
entity" St. Euthatius and a LOTW entry would be valid.
Hw?
73ss
Carsten, DL6LAU
More information about the Dxbase
mailing list