[DXBase] '03 to '04 imported database
George Harlem, W1EBI
[email protected]
Sun, 8 Jun 2003 21:18:00 -0400
I understand that, but I was curious why all the records loaded when I
entered the W3CMN call in the box. I assume (please confirm) that it
loaded all 5,351 records from the -03 database because I had registered
both call signs for DXB 2004. The Operator Callsign field in the new
-04 log is correct: first ten records are the W3 call and the rest are
W1EBI. I just didn't want to have to delete all records and do it all
again!
George
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:02 PM
To: George Harlem, W1EBI; 'DXBase Reflector'
Subject: Re: [DXBase] '03 to '04 imported database
If you get a message during import that says "error" then the record was
not
imported. So, when you got 100 percent dupes, none of the dupes were
loaded.
Regards,
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Harlem, W1EBI" <[email protected]>
To: "'DXBase Reflector'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 7:20 PM
Subject: [DXBase] '03 to '04 imported database
> Jack/Courtney, I did my first import from DXB2003 to DXB2004. I have
> ten records out of 5,351 from my old W3CMN callsign in the 1950's, the
> rest are W1EBI (have to cover the deleteds). I chose "W3CMN" under
> Operator Callsign for the import, and all 5,351 records were imported.
> The Operator Callsign is shown correctly for all records. I expected
> only the first ten records would be imported, then the remaining 5,341
> with the current call. A second import with "W1EBI" in the Op.
Callsign
> box produced 100% dupe errors. Duh. Is this a bug, did I do this
> right, or is my DXB2004 .mdb hosed? It all LOOKS correct on the
screen.
>> George
>> _______________________________________________
> DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase