[DXBase] DXB2004 sluggish with SH/FDX/50?
Jack
[email protected]
2003年4月27日 16:28:27 -0400
Ron,
I did it on a 500mhz machine and it processed in about 3 seconds. I did it
on a 3.5ghz and it was less than a second. In both cases, sound was turned
off. I doubt it can be any faster than that!
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Stordahl" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 3:31 PM
Subject: [DXBase] DXB2004 sluggish with SH/FDX/50?
> I just noticed this. Connected via telnet to an AR-Cluster (mine at
> dxspots.com) when I type SH/DX/50 the list comes thru very quickly, but
> when I type SH/FDX/50 (i..e. formated as if the spots had arrived
> normally) DXB2004 is very sluggish. What it is doing is looking at each
> line and determining which I need and transfering them to the needed
> spots window. This does take a little additional time, this was noticed
> in DXB2003, but now it seems to take a 'long' time.
>> Connecting instead using a stand alone telnet client I can verify that
> SH/FDX/50 is very quick, so its not a problem with AR-Cluster.
>> Assuming you have a reasonable size log, so it has a lot of looking to
> do, try doing a SH/FDX/50 and see what happens so I will know it's not
> only at my system.
>> Ron, N5IN
>> _______________________________________________
> DXBase Reflector - Please visit us on the web at www.dxbase.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> To UNSUBSCRIBE please visit:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dxbase