[Dx-qsl] DX SUMMIT

Sat Nov 22 21:31:30 EST 2014

I'm not bothering with that., because I can't think of the first suggestion that would make the new site better. The only suggestion I can think of is to return to the old site, and I doubt very seriously they would take us up on that after after all they have done to create a new site. The only thing I can think of that would make them reconsider would be for their hits to drop off dramatically. But if what they did works, then it works. Personally, I don't care for the new site and won't be using it.
This is sorta like the Hank Williams Jr. song I referred to in my other post. (When something is good, why does it change?) Also in the lyrics were why Coca-Cola changed their recipe. I remember that very well. The complaints didn't matter, but when their sales went way down, along came Classic Coke. 
I believe most of us are commenting here to test the waters to see if we are the only ones who don't care for "My DX Summit." It appears to me that most of us prefer the original DX Summit. (Our DX Summit) But I could be wrong, and this won't be the first time.

73, Hal K4HB
http://www.k4hb.com
http://www.k4hb.com/postage
http://www.k4hb.com/redneck
     (\____/)
     / ¤ _ ¤ \
    (   (oo)   )
     \-..~~.-/
      DX Pig
    Oink Oink
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 11/22/14, stevekz2i via DX-QSL <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
 Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] DX SUMMIT
 To: "MG" <mgreen at erols.com>, "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw at verizon.net>, "DX Posts" <DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net>
 Date: Saturday, November 22, 2014, 6:58 PM

 I would suggest HELPFUL observations,
 comments and suggestions be sent to the Summit owners.
  Nothing works perfectly in the first few
 days/weeks/months.  I'm quite sure they would love  to
 hear  from you. 

 73 De Steve  KZ2I 