[Dx-qsl] Fwd: Re: Fwd: RE: IRC's
Dave Haney
w3sj at tampabay.rr.com
Tue Dec 31 17:35:22 EST 2013
Gentlemen:
All hams are supposed to be ambassadors of good-will. Let's please keep
that in mind.
Happy (and tranquil) New Year to all.
73
Dave Haney
W3SJ
List Administrator
> Children, children, please take your tantrums private.
> --
> Dick Flanagan K7VC
> dick at k7vc.com
> Sent from a Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Lago <ac7dx at comcast.net>
> To: DX QSL Posts <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: 2013年12月31日 12:33 PM
> Subject: [Dx-qsl] Fwd: Re: Fwd: RE: IRC's
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE: IRC's
> Date: 2013年12月31日 15:17:02 -0500
> From: Joe Subich, W4TV <w4tv at subich.com>
> To: Ron Lago <ac7dx at comcast.net>, "Bill Moore, NC1L" <nc1l at arrl.org>
>>>> Be a dick Ron ...
>> >From the DXCC Rules 12(d) in part
>>> d) Blatant inequities in confirmation (QSL) procedures. Continued
>> refusal to issue QSLs under certain circumstances may lead to
>> disqualification.
> For me refusal, to accept IRCs is "blatant inequities in confirmation
> (QSL) procedures." USPS and all other members of the Universal Postal
> Union are *required* to accept them even if they don't sell them so
> your refusal to accept them is a "blatant inequity" to those who choose
> that method of *paying for the QSL*.
>> 73,
>> ... Joe, W4TV
>>> On 12/31/2013 1:41 PM, Ron Lago wrote:
>> So stuff it Joe!
>>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: RE: IRC's
>> Date: 2013年12月31日 18:32:43 +0000
>> From: Moore, Bill, NC1L (ARRL Awards Branch)<bmoore at arrl.org>
>> To: 'ac7dx at comcast.net'<ac7dx at comcast.net>
>>>>>>>> Hi Ron:
>>>> Well, I've been here almost 23 years and I know the rules inside an out
>> and there is no rule in DXCC relaying to anything that it is our duty to
>> accept them.
>>>> The only saying I am somewhat familiar with is that "the ultimate
>> courtesy of a QSO is a QSL". Nothing about IRC's
>>>> Accepting or not accepting is strictly a personal decision.
>>>> If he thinks there is a rule maybe you can ask him to direct you to it?
>> (I'd sure like to know!)
>>>> Regards
>>>> Bill Moore NC1L
>>>> Awards Branch Manager
>>>> *ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio^(TM)*
>>>> 225 Main Street
>>>> Newington, CT 06111
>>>> Telephone: (860) 594 0234
>>>> Fax: (860) 594-0346
>>>> email:bmoore at arrl.org <mailto:bmoore at arrl.org>
>>>> DXCC Web Site:www.arrl.org/dxcc <http://www.arrl.org/dxcc>
>>>> Blog:http://www.arrl.org/awards-blog
>> Twitter: arrl_dxcc
>>>> *From:*Ron Lago [mailto:ac7dx at comcast.net]
>> *Sent:* Monday, December 30, 2013 5:02 PM
>> *To:* dxccadmin
>> *Subject:* IRC's
>>>> Hello Bill...W4TV is busting my B***s because I do not wish to accept
>> IRC's anymore and "Im gonna report you cause its your ham duty to accept
>> them" and the DXCC rules say I must accept them. Its become a HUGE
>> problem at the PO because they have no idea in most places what to do.
>> KU9C was nice enough to get rid of hundreds for N2OO and Joe W3HNK and a
>> few from me because the PO said they wouldn't accept them or gave a run
>> around. I may opt to you paypal but I really feel its my decision on how
>> I wish to do the postage.
>> Please comment on how the DXCC feels.
>> Happy New Year to all
>> Very 73
>> Ron
>> AC7DX
>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>>>> ______________________________________________________________
> DX-QSL mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx-qsl
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
--
More information about the DX-QSL
mailing list