[Dx-qsl] Fwd: Re: Fwd: RE: IRC's

Tue Dec 31 15:26:49 EST 2013

This guy is hilarious......and because of him, will no longer accept IRC's
73
Ron
AC7DX
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Fwd: RE: IRC's
Date: 	2013年12月31日 15:17:02 -0500
From: 	Joe Subich, W4TV <w4tv at subich.com>
To: 	Ron Lago <ac7dx at comcast.net>, "Bill Moore, NC1L" <nc1l at arrl.org>
Be a dick Ron ...
 From the DXCC Rules 12(d) in part
> d) Blatant inequities in confirmation (QSL) procedures. Continued
> refusal to issue QSLs under certain circumstances may lead to
> disqualification.

For me refusal, to accept IRCs is "blatant inequities in confirmation
(QSL) procedures." USPS and all other members of the Universal Postal
Union are *required* to accept them even if they don't sell them so
your refusal to accept them is a "blatant inequity" to those who choose
that method of *paying for the QSL*.
73,
 ... Joe, W4TV
On 12/31/2013 1:41 PM, Ron Lago wrote:
> So stuff it Joe!
>>> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: IRC's
> Date: 2013年12月31日 18:32:43 +0000
> From: Moore, Bill, NC1L (ARRL Awards Branch) <bmoore at arrl.org>
> To: 'ac7dx at comcast.net' <ac7dx at comcast.net>
>>>> Hi Ron:
>> Well, I've been here almost 23 years and I know the rules inside an out
> and there is no rule in DXCC relaying to anything that it is our duty to
> accept them.
>> The only saying I am somewhat familiar with is that "the ultimate
> courtesy of a QSO is a QSL". Nothing about IRC's
>> Accepting or not accepting is strictly a personal decision.
>> If he thinks there is a rule maybe you can ask him to direct you to it?
> (I'd sure like to know!)
>> Regards
>> Bill Moore NC1L
>> Awards Branch Manager
>> *ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio^(TM)*
>> 225 Main Street
>> Newington, CT 06111
>> Telephone: (860) 594 0234
>> Fax: (860) 594-0346
>> email: bmoore at arrl.org <mailto:bmoore at arrl.org>
>> DXCC Web Site: www.arrl.org/dxcc <http://www.arrl.org/dxcc>
>> Blog: http://www.arrl.org/awards-blog
> Twitter: arrl_dxcc
>