[Dx-qsl] PSE ADVISE for SWL card

Thu Aug 16 01:47:55 EDT 2012

Phil,
I totally agreed with your policy.
I would like to translate the policy to Japanese language.
Yutaka, JQ2GYU
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Whitchurch [mailto:phil at g3swh.demon.co.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 2:41 PM
To: Yutaka Sakurai (ysakurai)
Cc: DX-QSL at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] PSE ADVISE for SWL card
My particular policy towards SWL cards is set out at http://www.g3swh.org.uk/swl_reports.html
Unfortunately, very few SWL reports comply as they only list a single station worked
73 for now
Phil
G3SWH
On 16-Aug-12 04:55:34, Yutaka Sakurai (ysakurai) (ysakurai at cisco.com) wrote:
> Erick, Ken, Murray, and the others,
>> Thank you very much for your advises.
> Actually, we got the SWL card enclosed with the QSL card from the same 
> person.
> The SWL card includes 160 - 10m SSB/CW/RTTY, but only 160m CW was made 
> by the same operator.
>> Another big issue is that the other reports on the SWL card are the 
> just same as the DX-cluster reports.
>> Yes, I, myself, have received such type of SWL reports a lot.
> Sometimes, the call sign that the SWL reports insist I made the QSO 
> are not in my log, but he or she just posted me on the DX-cluster.
>> I dare say most SWL reports I have received so far seem not to really 
> heard but only based on the DX-cluster reports.
> I am very sad to say that the SWL activities "to get QSL cards" are 
> dying in these days when we have the DX-cluster system.
>> Yutaka, JQ2GYU / JF1LZQ / WS2Y / M0LZP / T88YU
>> -----Original Message-----
> From: dx-qsl-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx-qsl-bounces at mailman.qth.
> net] On Behalf Of G. E. Janssens - K5WW
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 1:14 PM
> To: dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] PSE ADVISE for SWL card
>>> With all due respect for other
> people's opinions: I do see something w