[Dx-qsl] Re: [dx-list] DID I MISS SOMETHING ??

Thu Jun 21 17:13:05 EDT 2007

Per the link you gave, 6 by 9 is OK if it is under one ounce. (unless it is 
non-machineable)
Tom, W1TO
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Dougherty" <w2irt at comcast.net>
To: <dx-qsl at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] Re: [dx-list] DID I MISS SOMETHING ??
> Here's the info from USPS on what goes cheap and what gets goosed:
>> http://postcalc.usps.gov/PopUps/pop_up13.htm
>>>> At 03:00 PM 06/20/2007, Richard DiDonna NN3W wrote:
>>Yep. 6 x 9 is now "large size" and costs 0ドル.58
>>>>73 Rich NN3W
>>>>---- Ray <w8cnl at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> > AM MANAGER FOR 9K2ZZ, 9K9Z, ETC.
>> > TODAY RECEIVED A SASE FROM A K4 STATION IN TENN.
>> > OUTER ENVELOPE WAS A 6 X 9 INCH.
>> > HAD STANDARD 1ST CLASS STAMP ON IT.
>> > KICKER IS, IT ALSO CAME WITH 17 CENTS POSTAGE DUE !
>> > IS THIS A POST OFFICE CHANGE I MISSED ?? I KNOW SIZE MATTERS, BUT I
>> > DIDN'T KNOW THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT ENVELOPES !!!
>> > WAS NOT FOR WEIGHT AS IT ONLY HAD A STANDARD SAE AND 1 CARD IN IT. I
>> > ANSWERED IT OF COURSE BUT AM NOT LOOKING FORWARD TO THIS.
>> > ANY NEWS OR RUMORS GUYS ???
>>>> Cheers,
>> Peter,
> W2IRT
>