[Dx-qsl] More on the older style IRCS

Fri Jul 7 13:39:50 EDT 2006

If I invest money to my bank, I can get my money back plus an interest for 
that.
If I invest money to the postal system by pre-paying their services not 
rendered yet, one day they can say, thanks for your money but you will not 
get any service despite we promised it. Because we said so. We have simply 
changed our mind.
Very nice.
There are some 50-70 small IRCs and a couple of dozens of bigger ones laying 
on my shelf, still waiting for their turn. Most probably there are other 
people still sitting on all those IRCs. Trying to think globally, it's quite 
easy to imagine amounts of money earned by the UPU this way. Because they 
said so.
I wish a good lawyer follows this thread.
73,
Vladimir VE3IAE
---
> Found the publication:
>> http://www.usps.com/cpim/ftp/bulletin/2006/pb22184.pdf
>> see page 28. I've got a query into the Postmaster general as I type 
> asking how they can issue a bulletin on July 6th effectively cancelling 
> IRCS prior to 2002 on July 1. Gotta love government bureaucracy. I'm 
> just hoping the ones I exchanged on July 3rd will get 
> 'grandfathered'...else I'll be paying back over 300ドル.
>> 73
>>> &quot;Don't it always seem to go that you don't know what you've 
> got...till it's gone.&quot; from Big Yellow Taxi (Joni Mitchell) but also 
> true about QSL.NET if more users don't open their wallets and help 
> financially. Please contribute TODAY !!
>>