[personal] Re: [Dx-qsl] 2 IRC needed list?

Mon Feb 16 01:39:01 2004

I disagree. Upon checking with my local postmaster, all countries in the
Universal Postage Union have agreed that when presented with a 1oz letter
(or less) and a valid IRC, the postmaster will affix the amount of postage
stamps necessary for the letter to be sent by air. Period. Anyone living in
one of these countries asking for more than 1 IRC is .... Now as for GS, if
a DX station asks for more than 1 GS I will abide by their request. There
are many valid reasons why 1+ GS are necessary in certain countries. But
IRCs are treated universally.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <[email protected]>
To: "Tom Crawford" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 6:49 PM
Subject: [personal] Re: [Dx-qsl] 2 IRC needed list?
> The back of the (old) IRC's read, in English:
>> "This coupon is exchangeable in any country of the Universal Postage Union
> for one or more postage stamps representing the minimum postage for a
> priority item or an unregistered letter sent by air to a foreign country"
>> Note the wiggle room built in there. "Minimum postage" for example.
> Remember the old flimsy light weight air mail envelopes? Let's say for
the
> sake of argument that minimum postage covered that, just... and that a
> letter containing a QSL card, or even a QSL card sent "naked" by itself,
> weighs enough to require 3 stamps? Does it meet the letter of the rules?
> Sure, but...
>> Or, what if the postage for a priority letter (and for the sake of
argument,
> let's say it's a domestic one) is half that of an air mail letter? So 1
IRC
> is insufficient for an air letter... but it's not against the rules.
>> I could go on, but you get the drift. If a given administration wants to
> redefine IRC useage in such a way as to require more than one, they have
> many ways to do so -- legally.
>> Bottom line: If a DX station says "2 GS or 1 IRC" or "2 IRC no GS" or
> whatever, don't argue, do as they say. Most of them have good reasons for
> doing it that way.
>> 73, ron wn3vaw
>> "Life is pain... anyone who says otherwise is selling something"
> --The Princess Bride
>> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Crawford" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 5:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] 2 IRC needed list?
>>> This is something I just haven't come to grips with.
> If you read the back of the IRC, it says that (for countries honoring the
> coupon at all) it is good for the delivery of .... one letter equivalent
to
> what I interpret to be first class postage.
> Why would you ever need more than one??
> I don't think it's appropriate to go through currency conversion,etc.
> just my thoughts...
> Tom, W3TMC
>> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Scott" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 6:36 PM
> Subject: [Dx-qsl] 2 IRC needed list?
>>> Does anyone know a website that would tell me which Countries need more
than
> one IRC for return postage to the USA? I know VE,JA,ZL,VK need 2 anyone
know
> about any others?
> TU
> Rob WR3Y
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
> to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---
> Now, more than ever, QSL.NET is in urgent need of your financial support.
> Please help QSL.NET by sending a donation now.
>> Now, more than ever, QSL.NET is in urgent need of your financial support.
> Please help QSL.NET by sending a donation now.
>>> Now, more than ever, QSL.NET is in urgent need of your financial support.
> Please help QSL.NET by sending a donation now.
>>