[Dx-qsl] eQSL policy changed

Sat Apr 6 14:00:04 2002

Vince:
I never said the email wasn't authentic. Therefore your entire discussion
is based on a false premise.
Since you have obviously decided to determine what I can and can not comment
on, there is no point to further discussion.
73, ron wn3vaw
"Why, he's no fun, he fell right over."
-- The Firesign Theatre
----- Original Message -----
From: Vince <[email protected]>
To: Ron Notarius WN3VAW <[email protected]>
Cc: DX QSL <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Dx-qsl] eQSL policy changed
After reading all of your grief, I do not see any evidence presented that
would
indicate that the quoted email is not authentic. This does not surprise me
in
the least bit. Everything else that you have written just circumvents the
issue
that I have raised. I challenged you to present evidence that what is
quoted
is not authentic eMail from Bill Moore. What part of "bring on the evidence
Ron" do you not understand?
 To which eMail from Wayne Mills do you refer? I made no mention of
an
 eMail from Wayne in my posting which was a reply to the concerns of Gary
 Smith. Oh, you must be referring to my posting in which I gave the URL
for
 Wayne's statement. I gave that URL info for your benefit Ron, just because
you
 might not have known about it.
 I clipped 3/4 of your post because I did not want to address that
portion
and thereby prolong your grief. See Ron, I prefer to keep things in context
and
 avoid making any non relevant comments in my reply . Yes, let us not
confuse
 the issues at hand by introducing new grief-stricken statements.
 No one asked for your (1) interpretation of Bill's eMail. Read
the
 entire eMail from Bill Moore, and there should be little doubt that
permission
 was given to discuss the content.
 I doubt that there is any truth in your (4), because I am aware of
what
has already been discussed by the Advisory Board members. If you are upset
that
 eQSL.cc did not give you notice, that is truly a shame.
 OKay, I will clip all of your comments, to allow you to feel
better,
 lessen the bandwidth used, and not force others to read it again. You know
what
 you wrote in (1) and (4), so you will have no problem comprehending, or
will
 you?
Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
> NIL