[Antennas] Small Triband Beam

n8de at thepoint.net n8de at thepoint.net
Fri Feb 27 14:38:45 EST 2015


He said 12' turning RADIUS .. not diameter.
73
Don
N8DE
Quoting Ross Primrose <n4rp at n4rp.com>:
> That's well over his turning radius limit. The Cushcraft MA5B might be
> a better fit...
>> 73, Ross N4RP
>> On 2/27/2015 1:17 PM, n8de at thepoint.net wrote:
>> Cushcraft A3S is a well-performing tri-bander.
>> Have on up here at 34' and have worked over 300 DXCC with it the 
>> past three years.
>> 73
>> Don
>> N8DE
>>>>>> Quoting "David C. Hallam" <dhallam at knology.net>:
>>>>> I am looking for ideas about what would be a good small triband beam.
>>> About 20 ft. would be about as high up as I could get it. Ideally the
>>> turning radius would not more than 10 ft but maybe could go to 12 ft.
>>> My rig runs 900-1000W DC input. lp support this email list: 
>>> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>> -- 
> FCC Section 97.313(a) "At all times, an amateur station must use the 
> minimum transmitter power necessary to carry out the desired 
> communications."
>> ______________________________________________________________
> Antennas mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



More information about the Antennas mailing list

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /