[Antennas] Antenna-Related Patents

Wed Oct 15 18:46:02 EDT 2008

Chris Trask wrote:
>>> This is not a "binocular" core as defined in
>> the patent, because it does not have a top surface and bottom surface
>> and a rib. Now you might say it works just a well, and I wouldn't
>> argue that, but it doesn't count as far as the patent is concerned.
>>>> You obviously did not understand claim #6 in the patent, or perhaps you
> just skipped that one.
>> Chris

this appears to be suspiciously close to the 'software patents' issue - 
I've patented 1+1=2 your patent of 2+1=3 infringes mine (or Bach has 
patented 'B# followed by E)
If the words are long enough, and the document has enough pretty 
pictures it'll get through the patenting process.
The *REAL* test is IF he's got he balls to try to sue someone. ;)
Paul 5B8BA
-- 
People who read tabloids deserve getting lied to.
- Jerry Seinfeld