Frankly, I have a problem with people that post websites where they don't even know the difference between the words to and two! As in 2 two 1 SWR! :0( Learn to proof read before you post! You are showing your intelligence , or lack of it, to the world! 73 de Jerry, KØEJF E.J.(Jerry) Forwood -- W3OA <w3oa at adelphia.net> wrote: I'd like to put up a 160 antenna. I'm thinking of an inverted L. The vertical section would be 54 feet and I have room for a horizontal section up to 157 feet long. I am concerned about the radial field - it's approximately square, about 90 feet on each side. Is this hopelessly small? Should I try something like KE4UYP suggests at http://members.tripod.com/~KE4UYP/80m_160m_Antenna.html? I'd like to hear of peoples success, or failure, trying his design. Thanks for any suggestions - Dick, W3OA ______________________________________________________________ Antennas mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/antennas Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:Antennas at mailman.qth.net