[Antennas] Re: Dipole Suppression of Even-Ordered harmonics
Barry L. Ornitz
[email protected]
2002年1月16日 19:05:42 -0500
Doc, KD4E, wrote:
> Let's explore this a bit, please? Does a dipole, and
> perhaps slightly more so a folded-dipole, actually
> "reject" even-ordered TX harmonics or does it partially
> suppress them by failing to radiate them very
> efficiently?
Actually the antenna itself, radiating on even-ordered
harmonics, is not less efficient. However the feed
impedance of a center-fed antenna whose total length is an
even multiple of one-half wavelength at the operating
frequency is quite high. It is the transmitter output
impedance matching network, nominally designed for low
impedance output, that provides the harmonic suppression.
If a low impedance transmission line is used to feed the
antenna, on even harmonics the VSWR will be extremely high
leading to poor power coupling into the antenna, and
increased losses in the transmission line. The result is
that the harmonics are not radiated as well as the
fundamental, even though the antenna efficiency is high.
In this case, you have to view the transmitter's output
network, the transmission line, and the antenna as a
system, and say the system does not radiate the harmonics
as efficiently.
> I ask because it makes for an interesting relationship to
> certain amplifier designs. I forget off-hand which does
> which but does not the circuit selection in an amp (e.g.
> push-pull) lend to the creation of even or odd harmonics?
> If one then chose an amplifier design that favored even-
> ordered harmonics one could only use that amp with a
> dipole and thus compensate for some (how much?) of the
> garbage created by the amp with careful antenna design
> rather than lossy and costly filters.
Push-pull amplifiers tend to cancel even-order harmonics in
their output stages. Odd-order harmonics are still
present. The input impedance of center-fed antennas whose
total length is an odd multiple of one half wavelength is
generally low, providing little extra feedline attenuation
due to high VSWR on the odd-order harmonics. Thus the
push-pull amplifier provides no added harmonic suppression
here.
While an interesting question, the point is somewhat moot
as the FCC requires adequate harmonic suppression from the
transmitter, independent of what antenna is used.
However, if you look at the problem of maintaining spectral
purity of the transmitter, you will find that the harmonic
suppression properties of a given impedance matching
network in the transmitter can be affected by the actual
load the transmitter sees. We generally think of the
network providing matching from the output tube or
transistor to a 50 ohm or similar load. When a real
antenna and transmission line are the actual load the
network sees, the network may see close to its design load
at the fundamental frequency. But on harmonics, the load
may vary wildly in impedance from extremely low to
extremely high, and the harmonic suppression obtained with
a purely resistive load may be quite different that
obtained in actual usage.
73, Barry WA4VZQ [email protected]