[Antennas] RE: Expanding foam and antenna tunning
Barry L. Ornitz
[email protected]
2002年8月27日 00:16:47 -0400
Demetre Koumanakos <[email protected]> asked about
expanding foam in a particular antenna application:
> I constructed and installed a 50 Mc vertical coaxial
> center fed antenna this past weekend, the antenna itself
> is housed inside a fiberglass fishing rod in order to
> keep the coaxial vertical. The antenna tuned nicely
> throughout the band with less than 1.7 SWR.
>> The fishing rod itself seems to handle the wind nicely
> but the base of it where it is secured on two wooden
> planks with U bolts may need some reinforcing so it
> doesn't crush from the wind pressure at the U bolt
> contact points.
>> I thought of the Expanding Foam (Poly something....) used
> for insulation, but I was thinking, would this effect
> tuning ? has anyone had any experience with expanding
> foam on antenna applications ?
Several other people have already addressed some points on
this issue, but I would like to add a little more from a
safety and material science perspective.
The typical "expanding foam in a can" materials are
urethane foams. Based on isocyanate esters, they
polymerize when exposed to the moisture in air. The
foaming comes from dissolved gases in the liquid monomer.
Dow Chemical's "Great Stuff" is the material most commonly
found in home improvement stores but other manufacturers
make similar materials. These are typically used in many
applications to provide sealing, caulking and thermal
insulation. The foams are available from low expansion
varieties to those that expand considerably before
hardening.
As others have noted, these foams provide minimal
structural properties. They crush rather easily, so do not
consider using the foam to strengthen the base of the
antenna. A wood dowel, drilled to pass the inner coaxial
cable, and sized to provide a snug fit to the fiberglass
should be adequate to strengthen your base. While you
might consider some other lower-loss plastics here, the
base of the antenna is a low impedance point and dry wood
is probably quite adequate. Wood certainly has the
advantage of being easy to work with - an electric drill
and pocket knife are all the tools needed. Boiling the
wood in paraffin wax like us old-timers used to do will
waterproof it quite well. [Danger: Fire Hazard!]
Now Demetre might also be considering filling the entire
hollow fiberglass tube with the foam to hold the antenna
element centered in the shell. At this point the
electrical properties of the foam become quite relevant.
Urethane is not a good low-loss dielectric as someone else
noted. Also the foam has a dielectric constant greater
than unity so it will affect the tuning of the antenna. In
this application, the higher expansion foams will be
preferred as more of the finished foam is gas-filled void
space (and the gas has unity dielectric constant).
I would recommend against using this foam here for several
reasons beyond the electrical loss of the foam itself. The
first is that the installation is rather permanent. You
will never be able to remove the antenna from the
fiberglass cover once the foam is cured, so any adjustments
in the future are impossible. With the antenna being fed
with coaxial cable, you also have to worry about
unpolymerized monomer attacking the coaxial cable's
polyethylene dielectric as well as the cable's PVC jacket.
As I noted earlier this isocyanate monomer cures in the
presence of moisture in the air. Trying to get a deep
section cure inside the fiberglass tube may be difficult.
One approach is to spray some water into the tube as you
squirt in the foam. Yes it helps the cure, but it is not
particularly good for the electrical properties or the
corrosion of the antenna materials.
I think at this point, adequate reasons have been presented
to avoid using the foam in this particular application.
But there are many other applications around the home where
we might wish to use this material so let me add a few
other points.
I have already noted the problems with the need for
moisture if the foam is to cure in deep sections. For most
home applications, this is not a problem at all. But
ultraviolet resistance may be an issue in outdoor
applications. The cured urethane foam has virtually no
ultraviolet resistance. It rapidly deteriorates in the
presence of sunlight. You will need to paint over it after
curing if you plan to use it outdoors.
And now for some safety issues...
First the foam is very flammable until cured. Always work
well away from sparks and flames. Also wear protective
eyewear and gloves when working with this material. This
point cannot be emphasized enough. You do not want to
breath the fumes or get the uncured material on you skin.
The ingredients are all irritating to the eyes, skin, and
respiratory tract. Follow the manufacturers precautions
carefully.
Sadly there is an important point that the manufacturers
seldom discuss about these materials in their safety
precautions. This is the fact that isocyanates are what
are known as "sensitizers". Generally most people do not
have a problem with the initial exposure to these
materials. But after several exposures, some (but not all)
people become EXTREMELY sensitive to these materials to the
point that many allergic reactions are seen ranging from
itching skin and watery eyes to coughing, wheezing and
shortness of breath. Rarely, fatal asthma attacks can
occur. Minimizing your exposure to isocyanates is the best
way to prevent future problems so be careful and wear those
gloves.
73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ [email protected]