Cool.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Terry Reedy <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tjreedy@udel.edu" target="_blank">tjreedy@udel.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 6/18/2012 11:12 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Ok, banning ru"..." and ur"..." altogether is fine too (assuming it's<br>
fine with the originators of the PEP).<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
The original PEP never proposed ur or ru , only u/U.<br>
<br>
It turns out that ur is problematical even in 2.x, as its meaning is changed by the future import. 2&3 code should skip the convenience of the r prefix and just use u and doubled \s. The PEP should probably say that.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>