
<html>

 <head>

  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"

   http-equiv="Content-Type">

 </head>

 <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">

  <br>

  On 06/06/2012 09:16 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:

  <blockquote cite="mid:4FCF826D.7040007@pearwood.info" type="cite">Nevertheless,

   the world is full of doorknobs, and people will have to deal with

   their code.<br>

  </blockquote>

  <br>

  I'm having a hard time seeing it.&nbsp; Can you propose a credible

  situation where<br>

  <ul>

   <li>some programmer would have a reason (even a bad reason) to

    modify the cached Signature for a function,</li>

   <li>as a result it would no longer correctly match the

    corresponding function,<br>

   </li>

   <li>you would be forced to interact with this code and the

    modified Signature, and</li>

   <li>it would cause you problems?<br>

   </li>

  </ul>

  If you can, what adjustment would you make to the PEP to ameliorate

  this situation?<br>

  <br>

  And, as Brett cites, the consenting adults rule applies here.<br>

  <br>

  <br>

  All of a sudden I'm thinking of "Olsen's Standard Book Of British

  Birds",<br>

  <br>

  <br>

  <i>/arry</i><br>

 </body>

</html>