Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*

To: NetBSD Toolchain and Build Technical Discussion List <tech-toolchain%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
From: "Aaron J. Grier" <agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost>
Date: 2009年12月18日 13:31:43 -0800

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:39:33PM +0000, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> What you propose essentially means maintaining about any combination
> of those MK/USE settings. So yes, it is complicating, and even done
> right, I'm sure it will turn out to be a lot of work, and
> unfortunately, not just for you.
isn't it correct release engineering to ensure that all combinations of
MK variables are regularly built and tested? it's what, only ~2^40
different combinations? :)
-- 
 Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | 
agrier%poofygoof.com@localhost

References:
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Greg A. Woods
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Quentin Garnier
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Quentin Garnier
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Masao Uebayashi
- Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
  - From: Quentin Garnier

Prev by Date: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Next by Date: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Previous by Thread: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Next by Thread: Re: Sets, subsets, syspkgs, and MK*
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index