tech-toolchain: Re: ldd /usr/lib/lib*.so vs. ldd /usr/pkg/lib/lib*.so

Subject: Re: ldd /usr/lib/lib*.so vs. ldd /usr/pkg/lib/lib*.so
To: Todd Vierling <tv@wasabisystems.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>
List: tech-toolchain
Date: 09/11/2000 05:12:14

On 2000年9月10日, Todd Vierling wrote:
> The reason much of the base system doesn't use interlibrary dependencies on
> a regular basis is because NetBSD has supported (and periodically still
> supports) PICless code systems. However, that's not an argument for
> restricting third party software from making use of interlibrary
> dependencies in the base system--they should be there regardless.
So, what are we going to do on things like libssl/libcrypto?
 - Hubert
-- 
Hubert Feyrer <hubert.feyrer@informatik.fh-regensburg.de>