Re: 2nd round of xen benchmarking

To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>, Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: 2nd round of xen benchmarking
From: Brian Buhrow <buhrow%nfbcal.org@localhost>
Date: 2024年8月25日 08:30:09 -0700

	hello. Under NetBSD-9.9977, the VMX flag is reported by cpuctl identify. I'm pretty sure
it's reported under NetBSD-9 as well. Where it's not reported is on domu's themselves. I
assume this is because the xen hypervisor masks that capability from the domu.
-thanks
-Brian
Script started on Sun Aug 25 08:20:29 2024
%
%
%uname -a
NetBSD mirkwood.nfbcal.org 9.99.77 NetBSD 9.99.77 (MIRKWOOD) #0: Tue Jan 19 14:34:20 PST 2021 buhrow%loth-9.nfbcal.org@localhost:/usr/local/netbsd/obj-current/sys/arch/amd64/compile/MIRKWOOD amd64
%cpuctl identify 0 |grep -i 'vmx'
cpu0: features1 0x7ffafbff<SSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MONITOR,DS-CPL,VMX,SMX,EST>
%exit
%exit

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2nd round of xen benchmarking
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

References:
- Re: 2nd round of xen benchmarking
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

Prev by Date: Re: 2nd round of xen benchmarking
Next by Date: Re: 2nd round of xen benchmarking
Previous by Thread: Re: 2nd round of xen benchmarking
Next by Thread: Re: 2nd round of xen benchmarking
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index