Re: (weak) benchmarks

To: "Mathew, Cherry G." <c%bow.st@localhost>
Subject: Re: (weak) benchmarks
From: Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>
Date: 2024年7月25日 14:55:50 -0400

"Mathew, Cherry G." <c%bow.st@localhost> writes:
>>>>>> On 2024年7月25日 11:23:32 -0400, Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> said:
>
>> The dom0 is normal pv.
>> The i386 domUs are pvh/pvshim.
>> The amd64 are pv.
>
> What's the (v)CPU situation here ? 
menu=Xen:load /netbsd-XEN3_DOM0.gz bootdev=wd0a rndseed=/var/db/entropy-file console=pc;multiboot /xen.gz dom0_mem=4000M dom0_max_vcpus=1 console=vga
n10-amd64:vcpus = 2
n10-i386:vcpus = 1
n9-amd64:vcpus = 1
n9-i386:vcpus = 1
I had thought they were all 1. Builds were all with MAKE_JOBS=1.

References:
- (weak) benchmarks
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: (weak) benchmarks
  - From: Mathew, Cherry G.

Prev by Date: Re: (weak) benchmarks
Next by Date: Re: timekeeping regression? (a possible clue about the ~7.5 days)
Previous by Thread: Re: (weak) benchmarks
Next by Thread: Re: (weak) benchmarks
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index