On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:50:46AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > Why do you need to bridge to another interface at all? On my dom0 > box, I have fxp0 and xvifN.0 for 3 values of N. In my case, I have > them all bridged, and the xvifNs do not have addresses. But you could > just put an address on one of those in your private segment and > routing should work. You mean I can give an IP to one of the xvif interfaces and use that? Hmm, that looks like a pain to setup automatically at boot. And if that particular domU goes down, I have to reconfigure my dom0 to continue to communicate with the other domU's over the private LAN... Not ideal. > Probably lo(4) needs bridge support, and adding that would be the right > thing really. That looks like the most elegant solution (already suggested by Florian) but doesn't work ATM. Geert
Attachment:
pgpiNHc_oh2Ro.pgp
Description: PGP signature