Port-xen archive

---

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Updated Xen domain 0 benchmarking results

---

• To: Pavel Cahyna <pavel.cahyna%st.cuni.cz@localhost>
• Subject: Re: Updated Xen domain 0 benchmarking results
• From: Martti Kuparinen <martti.kuparinen%iki.fi@localhost>
• Date: 2005年6月28日 20:32:12 +0300

---

Pavel Cahyna wrote:

"...has poor performance under heavy I/O."
Sorry, but was it necessary to run benchmarks to discover this well
known and documented fact?

I'm planning to use LVM but I haven't figured out yet how to do it
if I want to have N domUs but I don't know what N will be...
Martti

---

• References:
  • Updated Xen domain 0 benchmarking results
    • From: Martti Kuparinen
  • Re: Updated Xen domain 0 benchmarking results
    • From: Pavel Cahyna

---

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Xen domain-U starting error]
• Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Xen domain-U starting error]
• Previous by Thread: Re: Updated Xen domain 0 benchmarking results
• Next by Thread: Re: Updated Xen domain 0 benchmarking results
• Indexes:
  • reverse Date
  • reverse Thread
  • Old Index

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index