Re: policy proposal: updating packages with many dependencies

To: Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: policy proposal: updating packages with many dependencies
From: Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%pkgsrc.org@localhost>
Date: 2025年3月20日 12:22:11 +0000

* On 2025年03月19日 at 12:44 GMT, Greg Troxel wrote:

A few years ago I would have suggested cmake be on this list, but it
seems upstream is more stable now, and I don't remember recent troubles.

The recent changes where they go out of their way to break the use of

WRKOBJDIR=/private/tmp on macOS for absolutely no good reason wouldsuggest otherwise:

 https://github.com/drecklypkg/dreckly/blob/ci/cmake-cleanup/devel/cmake/patches/patch-Source_kwsys_SystemTools.cxx
I personally wouldn't trust any cmake updates.
--
Jonathan Perkin pkgsrc.smartos.org
Open Source Complete Cloud www.tritondatacenter.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: policy proposal: updating packages with many dependencies
  - From: Greg Troxel

References:
- policy proposal: updating packages with many dependencies
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: policy proposal: updating packages with many dependencies
  - From: Greg Troxel

Prev by Date: Re: pkgin suggesting pkg downgrade?
Next by Date: Re: pkgin suggesting pkg downgrade?
Previous by Thread: Re: policy proposal: updating packages with many dependencies
Next by Thread: Re: policy proposal: updating packages with many dependencies
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index