Apparently esdl-license, used by devel/libsmi, is not marked as default acceptable, which is puzzling to me because it reads to me like an unremarkable permissive free software licence. It looks like Debian has accepted it in main a long time ago (back in 2011), so I infer that it must have passed DFSG: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libsmi https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/libs/libsmi/copyright-0.4.8dfsg2-16 Is there any reason not to rename it esdl and make it default acceptable? (There is some extra language in esdl-license not appearing at https://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/COPYING.html?lang=de, and a 3-clause-bsd that does appear in there, so maybe these should be tweaked a little bit to separate the paragraphs, and the four cases in-tree updated to reflect this adjustment, but that's a minor issue past the main question here.)