tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Various py-* packages missing atomic64.mk

To: Havard Eidnes <he%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: Various py-* packages missing atomic64.mk
From: Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>
Date: 2025年1月16日 15:14:25 -0500

Given all that, adding atomic64.mk certainly seems in order, to each
package that needs it. I don't really understand what other approach
you might be thinking of.

References:
- Various py-* packages missing atomic64.mk
  - From: Havard Eidnes
- Re: Various py-* packages missing atomic64.mk
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: Various py-* packages missing atomic64.mk
  - From: Havard Eidnes

Prev by Date: Re: Various py-* packages missing atomic64.mk
Next by Date: Git dependencies in Rust
Previous by Thread: Re: Various py-* packages missing atomic64.mk
Next by Thread: Git dependencies in Rust
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index