Re: libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS

To: "tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost NetBSD Discussion" <tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: 2014年7月13日 15:42:28 +0200

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:39:22PM +0200, Richard PALO wrote:
> I believe that '-fstack-protector*' is quite similar in this
> respect, and that if '-fstack-protector*' is required to build the
> shared library with libtool, then it will be necessary to ultimately
> link to this new shared library.
No, it isn't. Once the stupid static linkage issue is fixed, it becomes
only necessary when *statically* linking. E.g. if libperl.so was built
with -fstack-protector, something linking against libperl.so doesn't
have to.
Joerg

References:
- libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS
  - From: Richard PALO
- Re: libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS
  - From: Richard PALO
- Re: libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS
  - From: Richard PALO
- Re: libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS
  - From: Richard PALO
- Re: libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS
  - From: Richard PALO

Prev by Date: Re: libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: libtool, -fstack-protector, -nostdlib, and while we're at it -Bdirect on SunOS
Next by Thread: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index