On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:52:06PM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote: > Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> writes: > > > is there a good reason for keeping lang/gcc and lang/gcc3? > > Yes, there exists software that requires varargs, which entails using > gcc 2.95 for development. Couldn't that be rewritten to stdarg? I did this with some package 10 years ago... -is -- seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/