Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?
• From: Andrew Gierth <andrew@...>
• Date: 2020年8月11日 11:06:36 +0100

---

>>>>> "孙世龙" == 孙世龙 sunshilong <sunshilong369@gmail.com> writes:
 孙世龙> Hi, Sean Conner, Adrian,Roberto
 孙世龙> I see. I agree with you.
 孙世龙> Realloc(3) can fail when shrinking the block.
 孙世龙> It seems that Lua has made such an assumption.
In 5.3, yes. I pointed out this bug on this very mailing list in
November 2017 and it has not been fixed in 5.3, only in 5.4.
-- 
Andrew.

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, 孙世龙 sunshilong

• References:
  • Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, 孙世龙 sunshilong
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, Stefan
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, Stefan
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, Philippe Verdy
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, Andrew Gierth
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, 孙世龙 sunshilong
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, Sean Conner
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, 孙世龙 sunshilong
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, Sean Conner
  • Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?, 孙世龙 sunshilong

• Prev by Date: Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?
• Next by Date: Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?
• Previous by thread: Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?
• Next by thread: Re: Are there some potential problems if I use a self-defined memory acquirement function instead of realloc(3) in the l_alloc function?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread