Re: warning in mingw [Was: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (rc1) now available]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: warning in mingw [Was: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (rc1) now available]
- From: 云风 Cloud Wu <cloudwu@...>
- Date: 2020年4月24日 11:27:33 +0800
Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> 于2020年4月23日周四 下午11:42写道：
> particular, to do that, wouldn't be better 'void(*)()' instead of
> 'void(*)(void)'?
No, void(*)() can't prevent the complaint of gcc. Because "no
parameter specification" is different from "no parameters" .
--
http://blog.codingnow.com
_______________________________________________
lua-l mailing list -- lua-l@lists.lua.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lua-l-leave@lists.lua.org