Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
• Date: 2019年6月29日 14:55:36 -0300

---

> And then you realize that Lua may allocate memory during function *calls*
> (e.g. growing the stack). I don't think this is covered in the current
> <toclose> approach either.
I think it is.
-- Roberto

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Philipp Janda

• References:
  • [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available, Dirk Laurie
  • Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sean Conner
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Sergey Kovalev
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), pocomane
  • Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available), Philipp Janda

• Prev by Date: Re: Replace the last item in a string of 'words'
• Next by Date: Re: Non-linear lexical scoping (again) and an idea about __unset
• Previous by thread: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• Next by thread: Re: Yet another proposal for <toclose> (was Re: [ANN] Lua 5.4.0 (alpha) now available)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread