Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?
- From: Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@...>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:42:07 +0100
On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 15:35, Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> local resource x = foo()
>
> to be interpreted as
> local <toclose> x = foo()
> or
> local resource; x = foo()
>
The former as the latter is impossible.
So if you say:
local resource = 0
Then resource is a variable.
But if you say:
local resource x = 0
Then x is a variable, and resource is a qualifier.
Does that make sense?
Regards
- References:
- Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Pavel
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Oliver Kroth
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Ulrich Schmidt
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Sergey Zakharchenko
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Rodrigo Azevedo
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Egor Skriptunoff
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Ryan Ford
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, szbnwer@<a href="/cgi-bin/echo.cgi?gmail.com">...</a>
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Matthew Wild
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Syntactical ugliness - does it matter?, Matthew Wild