Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
• From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
• Date: 2018年7月21日 08:55:57 -0300

---

> >From the land of PEP: deterministic cleanup for iterators
> 
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0533/
> 
> Can the prospective scoped locals be applied to this use case?
No. The proposed 'with' clause also does not seem to apply :-)
-- Roberto

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, John Belmonte
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, Patrick Donnelly

• References:
  • (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, John Belmonte
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, John Belmonte
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, Viacheslav Usov
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, John Belmonte
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace, John Belmonte

• Prev by Date: Re: Purpose of second argument for math.randomseed
• Next by Date: Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
• Previous by thread: Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
• Next by thread: Re: (not) handling new programming idioms with grace
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread