Re: Lua 5.0 wasn't that bad, actually
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.0 wasn't that bad, actually
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: 2018年6月28日 08:52:02 -0300
> It’s interesting though, as Dirk notes, that tables USED to have this value in 5.0 and it was later dropped, so in some ways it’s a wash.
Tables in Lua never had this value. Lua 5.0 used either the field 'n' (if
present) or an auxiliary weak table to keep the size of arrays.
-- Roberto