Re: Mime type registration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Mime type registration
From: Thomas Jericke <tjericke@...>
Date: 2017年9月26日 15:06:47 +0200

On 25.09.2017 17:35, Charles Heywood wrote:

[Bytecode is definitely not portable across Lua versions and probably not portable across architectures.

Regarding a mime type for bytecode...

Is bytecode portable across all Lua versions, operating systems (and releases), and processors ... or ... will byte code generated on a windows/intel/little endian machine work on an embedded-os/PowerPC/big-endian machine?

Frank

Ryan | Charles <vandor2012@gmail.com>

Software Developer / System Administrator

https://hashbang.sh

From my experience Lua 5.2 bytecode is definitely not portable between 32bit and 64bit architectures and not portable between big and little endian systems.
--
Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mime type registration, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo

References:
- Mime type registration, Daurnimator
- Re: Mime type registration, Marc Balmer
- Re: Mime type registration, Oliver Kroth
- Re: Mime type registration, Charles Heywood
- Re: Mime type registration, Marc Balmer
- Re: Mime type registration, Frank Kastenholz
- Re: Mime type registration, Charles Heywood

Prev by Date: Re: Metatable Lookup Rules
Next by Date: Re: Mime type registration
Previous by thread: Re: Mime type registration
Next by thread: Re: Mime type registration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread