Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again
From: Doug Currie <doug.currie@...>
Date: 2017年9月13日 17:33:30 -0400

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Dibyendu Majumdar <mobile@majumdar.org.uk> wrote:

Dynasm is an assembler so that is even worse than writing LLVM IR -
you have to write assembly code for each architecture you wish to
support.

Have you considered SLJIT?

https://sourceforge.net/projects/sljit/

e

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again, Alexander Nasonov
- Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again, Dibyendu Majumdar

References:
- Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again, Dibyendu Majumdar
- Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again, Sean Conner
- Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again, Dibyendu Majumdar

Prev by Date: Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again
Next by Date: Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again
Previous by thread: Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again
Next by thread: Re: Starting a JIT backend for Ravi yet again
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread