Re: Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negativeoperand(s).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negativeoperand(s).
From: "Tony Papadimitriou" <tonyp@...>
Date: 2017年1月25日 11:37:05 +0200

>Wait, what am I saying, this is a language that thinks 1-based indexing is a good thing, forget I said anything. /s

Yes, what exactly are you saying? This *IS* a great thing! And Lua isn’t the only language to do it right.

(Yet another C-derived language infested programmer I suppose... Do you also count your fingers from 0 to 9?)

I expect your ‘friends’ will soon voice their support for you...

References:
- Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negative operand(s)., Milo Christiansen
- Re: Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negative operand(s)., Soni L.
- Re: Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negative operand(s)., Milo Christiansen
- Re: Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negative operand(s)., Milo Christiansen

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negative operand(s).
Next by Date: Lua for Time Travel (!)
Previous by thread: Re: Re: Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negative operand(s).
Next by thread: Re: Modulo operator produces incorrect results with negative operand(s).
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread