Re: 'table' as fallback for tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Subject: Re: 'table' as fallback for tables
• From: "Soni L." <fakedme@...>
• Date: 2016年6月30日 20:40:35 -0300

---

On 30/06/16 08:36 PM, Tim Hill wrote:

On Jun 30, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:

— How should constructors set length? What are the lengths of {}, {1, 2} and {1, 2, [3]=3} ?

0, 2, and 2.
-- Roberto

Agreed.
—Tim

What about {1, [3]=3, 2} ? {1, [2]=2, 2} ? etc
--
Disclaimer: these emails may be made public at any given time, with or without reason. If you don't agree with this, DO NOT REPLY.

---

• References:
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Jay
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Philipp Janda
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Adrián Pérez de Castro
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Andrew Starks
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, steve donovan
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Coda Highland
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: 'table' as fallback for tables, Tim Hill

• Prev by Date: Re: 'table' as fallback for tables
• Previous by thread: Re: 'table' as fallback for tables
• Next by thread: Re: 'table' as fallback for tables
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread