Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index]
[
Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules
- From: Peter Aronoff <telemachus@...>
- Date: 2016年2月11日 19:29:26 -0500
Jonathan Goble <jcgoble3@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have always interpreted the manual's "convention" as referring
> specifically to global names (i.e. fields in _G), since Lua may use such
> names for its own purposes (e.g. _G and _VERSION). I've never interpreted
> it to mean that such names should be avoided even in module tables, since
> Lua itself doesn't use such names anywhere but _G.
That's what I've always thought too. But since the manual's advice has come
up a couple of times on this thread, I thought I would check what others
thought.
Thanks.
--
We have not been faced with the need to satisfy someone else's
requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful.
Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, The UNIX Time-Sharing System
- References:
- Putting version information, description, copright into modules, Marc Balmer
- Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules, Daurnimator
- Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules, Peter Aronoff
- Re: Putting version information, description, copright into modules, Jonathan Goble